Cursed Indian Male

Is Delhi the rpe capital or whre capital

2012-01-14T08:24:00.000-08:00

The Indian media has painted Delhi as the rape capital of India. This slander has mainly been spread by cheap journalists. Majority of these journo's are losers, incompetent, don't want to do hard work, and are always looking for easy and spicy news items. To the uninformed, most of these rape cases are false. (If you are interested, dig around for facts.)

Yesterday, this news caught my attention
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/panchkula-double-murder/1/168609.html
It was about a murder of a women and her daughter.The duo was found murdered in their home. The daughter was earlier involved in an MMS campaign. She had circulated MMS of another girl. (Note - Majority of so called crime against females are perpetrated by females only). Now comes the interesting part. The news report at the end said "The police also recovered around 150 condom packets from the house and were probing its connection with the murders."

Certainly these women weren't running AIDS awareness campaign, to stockpile so many condoms.
Would it be a possibility that it is a case of a deal went bad, and the women in question threatened to cry "rape". Given that majority of the rape cases are false, this is a strong possibility. And the person(maybe a gentlemen) in question, might have thought it better to shut these women, rather then face the ignominy of being labeled as a "rapist" !!!
Given India's draconian rape laws, this is very much a possibility. And more and more men, might take this extreme step, rather then get screwed by the tyrannical laws.

Despite all of this, unfortunately instead of being called the "whore" capital, Delhi is being called as the "rape" capital.

Why Family courts got created in India

2011-12-25T08:53:00.000-08:00

On Maharashtra State Commission for Women website, under the below link the reasons for creation of Family court is given.
http://mahilaayog.maharashtra.gov.in/new/spl_court.php

The reason, that is given is "Family Courts were established for Women". So should men expect justice from such a court ?

The page further states that "Advocates are normally not allowed in the Family Court. However, they are permitted in special circumstances." Nothing can be farther from truth. Family court is full of lawyers. In fact, people (whose cases are going on) are told to wait outside the court room, and only lawyers are allowed to move freely.

Reality is that family courts are created to harass (mostly innocent) husbands, and to extort their hard earned money. Such is the secrecy in family courts, that they don't even publish their judgements on internet. Since transparency brings down corruption. Judiciary always hates transparency.

International Men's Day Press Release, by Men's Rights Association

2011-11-17T04:37:00.000-08:00

We (Men's Rights Association) had a very good response, for the International Men's Day Press Release held at Patrakar Bhavan, Pune, India.

The links for the Press Release are here => English Marathi. The docs are in pdf format.

There were about 30+ journo's to cover this. Hope they print all this stuff. The facts(bitter truth) were difficult to swallow for many of them. Got a plethora of queries. Overall the event was pretty good.

All of this stuff shatters the orthodox/conventional mind set. Past experience, has proved, that those who have came with open mind, have accepted the position, that Male is the weaker gender, and not female, as is portrayed.

Happy Men's Day in advance to ALL of You.

Ladies and Jerks

2011-08-06T08:07:00.000-07:00

It is a common practice by males to refer to "any kind of" women as a lady. Though the synonym of lady is gentleman, men are rarely referred to as gentleman. Men are mostly referred to as guy, man, etc. The general attitude of such males is that by default most males are jerks. But they forget that they themselves are the jerks.

Most men, think, that they are showing gentlemanly behavior, when they are referring to any woman as a lady. But since they themselves don't show much respect to males overall, this behavior of referring to any women as lady, makes them look like a jerk. This rubbish practice is widely prevalent in Indian society. These men, are the fallacy of propaganda, which tells people, to respect a women, solely on the basis of her gender. This chivalrous behavior cuts through all strata of society. By showing chivalry towards women, while showing disrespect towards other males, makes them look sex starved.

But there are still some gentleman left, who refer to their male counterparts as gentleman. May their tribe increase.

The need of the hour is to in-culminate gender neutral behavior, and not be blinded by gender of any person, specifically females :-)

Why Maria Susairaj got "acquitted"

2011-07-02T09:39:00.000-07:00

Because, she is woman !
Many would find this offensive but that is the truth. Please read her confessional statement. Inspite of retracting her own statements, the judge didn't took ANY action against her, for this treachery. Why ? because she is a woman. The Indian law prescribes punishment of upto seven years, for false evidence. She did all she could, to mislead people, but still she went scot free. Indian law(judiciary), is prescribed to the view that women, never lie, and if they do, they do because of pressure from someone else. How can an abla naari commit such a heinous crime. The two males were to be blamed. Why did Niraj went at night to Maria's place ? So that he can threaten the abla naari, who was alone ? Many such questions, would come, if the case goes to high court.

Still, for people who are clamoring for heavy punishment for her, my best wishes.

Maria has said, that she was raped, by her boyfriend. Now what do you call that ?

Does Family Implies only Females ?

2011-06-11T09:00:00.000-07:00

Different people have different viewpoints about anything, but in social norms, normally not many viewpoints are available. Case in point is the definition of a family. Though some may argue, that there are different views about family, when it comes to practice, there is still a majority view, which is acceptable to most people. The majority view is normally conservative. What is that view ? That view is that females are an essential part of a family, and that they need to be protected. Take an e.g. of family room/areas in a restaurant. If a group of females(with no accompanying male), enters the family area, they are greeted. It can be that none of the females are related by any blood relationship, or they may be just acquaintances of each other. But they can go in the family area. However, if say two men, who are brothers, try to enter the family room, they are normally stopped, and requested to occupy the general area. If they have a female(who may not be a "family" member) accompanying them though, they can enter the family area.

Even when people inquire a man about his family, they essentially are asking about his wife. (Indian) Society feels that females, more specifically wife is an essential part of any family. And without a wife, there can be no family. So even though, you have a loving an caring mother, sister, father, brother. That amounts to nothing, for general people. It is a faulty and shallow viewpoint though. Since these people think, that if you are not pro-creating, you aren't part of the society. It is essential to note that Indian scriptures do not mandate such a thing. Though scriptures speaks about Grushasthshram, it is not mandatory. God Hanuman never married, even when many efforts were made towards that end by his "well-wishers". Though, if we think about it, Hanuman is an essential part of Ram's family. At their core, even other religions would subscribe to this view.

Fallacy of rising crime against women

2011-05-15T09:08:00.000-07:00

The latest figures released by Maharashtra Police, sheds light on the false propaganda of rise in crime against women.

Per these stats, the only crimes that are on rise is dowry related. Research has proved the reason, why dowry related crimes are seen as increasing. It is very easy to lodge a false dowry harassment complaint. Lodging a false complaint by a wife is not a crime, per the Indian judiciary. Additionally any death of a married woman is recorded as dowry death. It has became a huge extortion racket. Laws meant to protect wife, are very loosely worded, and are rampantly used to harass honest straight forward husbands, and his relatives. It is high time, that these moronic laws (read IPC 498A, 304B, 306, etc )are scrapped.

How you can stop the suicides

2011-04-06T10:01:00.000-07:00

Since there is a mass tyranny going on in India, due to the legal terrorism unleashed on millions of people. Some people started voicing their concern, and are fighting against this unjust law (IPC 498A). After years of steady efforts(and thousands of suicides), the government, has finally decided to have a re-look at this tyrannical law. Currently it is pending before law commission. Though the govt won't repeal this unjust law, it is the duty of every responsible citizen, to voice their concern against such unjust laws.

Below is a link on the law commission website, which has a questionnaire on their website.

http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/reports/cp-s498.doc

Request you to please reply to that. Below is one such reply.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R1Lx6x019unIrS0BTmEsQgXkxQ2uRCjDZ2Vb0-EPw6s/edit?hl=en

You can take copies of this, and add your Name, Address, Signature, etc, and send it t, the below address

498A questionnaire reply
LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA, 2nd Floor, The Indian Law Institute Building
(Opp. to Supreme Court), Bhagwandas Road, New Delhi - 110 001.

Why did the family committed suicide

2011-04-06T09:24:00.000-07:00

Recently in Pune, four members of a family(a man, his brother, and parents) committed suicide.

http://www.ndtv.com/article/cities/pune-four-members-of-a-family-commit-suicide-93734

http://www.mid-day.com/news/2011/mar/240311-news-pune-suspect-internal-fracas-case-of-suicide.htm

http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report_harassed-four-of-pune-family-kill-themselves_1523979

Though, whoever heard about it, sympathized about the family, many were in self denial about the real cause of the suicide. The man had written a well thought out and very elaborate, five page will before dying. Both the man and his brother were very well educated, and had been very succesful in their respective careers. They were in a very good financial condition. Then why did they committed suicide ?

To the honored, dishonor is worse than death.

- Bhagwad Gita (2.34)

Turned out, that the man had been married last year. The marriage didn't turned out well. The wife started tormenting the husband. She even went to his office, and created a fracas, over there, to embarrass him. She threatened to file a police complaint against him. Unable to bear the agony, he and his family committed suicide.

Hmm, sounds crazy, and hard to believe ? Well in that case, you must not have heard about the dreaded Indian Penal Code, Section 498A. This tyrannical law was passed in the year 1983, by the Indian Parliament. The goal behind enacting this law, was to curb "dowry menace". Since according to propaganda (as shown in various films, and newspapers, of that time) Daughter In Law, was the most harassed species on earth. So the law was made very harsh. It gave the power to any Indian wife to go to local Police Station, and lodge a complaint against her husband, and any of his relatives. Upon such a complaint, the police were duty bound to arrest the husband, and anyone, who has named by the abla naari. In legal terms, this is called, cognizable, and non-bailable.

As time passed on, many unscrupulous Indian wives discovered, that they can simply go to any police station in India, and lodge a complaint against their husbands. The law made it mandatory, that the wife can lodge the complaint, in any corner of the country. The police had to take the complaint, and act. Unless though, the husband, is a politician, and has got money and connections.

Quite obviously the main victims of this tyrannical law, were honest, straight forward husbands, and their family members. With the growth in knowledge about this deadly legal provision, thousands of cases started being filed, across the country. The result - in the last ten years, more then a million men (11,01,337) and 3,24,951 women have been arrested, The fact, that more then 98% of these people got acquitted is testimony to the fact, that most of these cases were false.
It comes without saying, that all these abla naari's go scot free, after filing all these false cases.

Since society views that "no smoke without fire". But society doesn't realizes that in matrimonial issues, wherein most of the cases due to minor ego issues, cases are lodged, doesn't means that husband should be sent to jail.

Below link, gives good analysis, of what kind of wife lodges a 498A case.
http://indianhusbands.blogspot.com/2005/08/498a-made-for-sita-but-surpanakhas-are.html

It is no wonder that 498A is always preceded with the word false, and these cases are termed as false 498A. One can do a thesis on this. In fact, one person, already has on some aspect of these.

Repealing of this tyrannical law will be a fitting tribute, to the victims of the suicide.

Tolerance for legal terrorists (and their supporters) ?

2011-01-21T11:23:00.000-08:00

Normally everywhere the norm is now, zero tolerance for sexual harassment. In India, what this means is particularly zero tolerance, for any even suggestive action against young females. Indian law, identifies this female, as young female, and mostly a wife. The law is trying to be more broad, and broaden the base of what it means by "females". There is a huge industry around, which has got its own vested interests (with of course not so honest motives) in shaping the opinion of general public, as to how these venerable females need to be showered with protection, care, benefits, etc. These people, are very much behind campaigns like Domestic Violence Against Women(Bell Bajao), Save the Girl Child, etc. On the face of this, even though this campaigns sound, very noble, they are not. If you do a little surface scratching, you easily understand the sham behind all these campaigns. Keep in mind, all these campaigns are funded by the money of tax payers. Money is just one aspect of it. The social implications, of this feminist onslaught is catastrophic. Take a look at western europe. By some estimates, due to low birth rate, we will start to see the end of western civilization as we know of. (males aren't marrying, due to feminist laws, resulting in low birth rates, and resulting in declining population). Thanks to the feminazi's, the same disease has taken firm roots in India.

It is the feminists, who are spreading the poison of misandry (male hatred), and worse are those, who blindly believe them. The ones, who support them, are equally evil, because, without their support, these feminists, won't make much headway. Silent supporters of evil, are equally evil, history is testimony to that. This evil nexus needs to be broken.

Well of course, we need to weed out this evil. And do we need to show any tolerance to those who perpetrate this evil ? Of course NOT. We need to have a zero tolerance policy against the perpetrators of legal terrorism, and also those, who are silent supporters.

Note - I will keep updating this post.

Should Death by Stoning be Introduced ?

2010-11-26T08:45:00.000-08:00

It seems many people are eager to introduce the heinous punishment of, death by stoning. Most likely many of your friends, might have the same views too.

Recently some person, had posted a picture, which depicted a man, dragging a girl by the hair, the caption was "0MG! This GUY must be St0ned to Death for doing this to a GIRL!"
Surprisingly this pic, was circulated quickly, and gathered a fan following in 10's of thousands, very quickly. The people who supported this, can be easily termed as cold-blooded. Simply by seeing a picture, of which they do not have any context, no verification, whether it is a fake or not, they readily believed it. And they even supported stoning the guy to death. Wow. Many (sick) guys would have supported it, to show to their female friends, how much they care about girls. Is there any difference between taliban, and the supporters of such pic ?

In many developed countries, capital punishment is banned, however serious the crime be. But here people have pronounced a very cruel way of capital punishment, for pulling hair.

If you are really in a bad mood, and want to kick anyone's ass, I would say, people who liked this crap pic, should be on top of your list.

Why institution of marriage came into being ???

2010-10-15T10:14:00.000-07:00

A legend goes, as to how the institution of marriage was created.

There was a sage called Uddalaka. He had a son called Swetaketu. Swetaketu was a small boy aged about eight or 10 years. Uddalaka was making morning oblations to the Sun God. His wife was supplying water to him. While the oblations were continuing, another Brahmin came and made a proposition to the lady that they should go together for sexual intercourse and the lady readily agreed. The boy was taken aback and Swetaketu told his father: "How is it that you have allowed my mother to go with another man?" The father, Uddalaka says: "Boy, that is the rule of the land." But Swetaketu did not agree. At a later stage, he became a great sage. He wrote an Upanishad also and he propounded the first theory of Uddalaka-Swetaketu principles where in adultery was prohibited.

As can be seen from above, that an adulterous women, was what prompted creation of institute of marriage. Also it was initiated by a son, who wanted his parents to stay with him. However, when he drafted the laws, he didn't got prejudiced, and made the law gender neutral, i.e. he forbade adultery by both the husband and wife.

However, centuries later, (rather more then 2 millennium) when Hindu Marriage Law (HMA), was drafted, it didn't forbade made adultery by a wife a crime. But ironically, the law said that, if a wife commits adultery, the man with whom, she commits adultery is the guilty person. The law takes the view, that the wife is innocent, and has been deceived :) Probably the law makers were too prejudiced, with what was happening in their own lives.

HMA also favors wives, when custody of children is given, when couples seperate. Which in itself, negates the whole concept of marriage.

All this, made one very highly knowledgeable person, remark (before 1983)
"Marriage has became nothing more then institutionalized prostitution."

Shiney Ahuja and biased Indian laws

2010-09-08T10:13:00.000-07:00

The recent case of Shiney Ahuja, has brought into spot light, how tyrannical Indian laws really are. His maid, who accused him of rape, later retracted her statement in the court.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/Shiney-never-raped-me-Maid/articleshow/6512247.cms

For those, who are aware of cases of offenses against women, this was no surprise. In fact it is a standard practise in India, by unscrupulous (mostly young) women, to misuse laws, and file false caes to extort huge amount of money from the accused. Indian laws presume, before any investigation, that a complaint made by a women of harassment against a men is genuine.
Most of these laws are very strict, bail is not so easy to get. Shiney Ahuja, with all his money and fame, still had to spend 100+ days in prison. Image, what is the plight of millions languishing in Indian prisons, under such false cases. Will it be surprising, if atleast some amongst these millions decide to react for all the atrocities committed on them ? It is not surprising, then, that the Indian legal system is good at creating criminals.

Add to it, we have incompetent and corrupt judges, who add to the misery of innocent accused. With all the trial by media, and sex starved Indian society, the innocent accused is driven to despair. No wonder India, has such a high rate of suicides amongst males, in the age group of 20 to 50.

Domestic violence against men

2010-07-19T11:24:00.000-07:00

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Socrates_and_Xanthippe.jpg

From time immemorial men have been harassed by wives. Please see one of the most prolific depiction of same above. This is domestic violence against men, and very few people dare to voice their concern. Some idiots might laugh at this.
However the cunning wives, used to spread a slander campaign against their husbands, telling everyone, that how they were been tortured. Open any ancient scripture, and you will definitely come across remarks made about wives. Most of these remarks, tell about the cunning nature of wives in general. All Indian scriptures are full of stories about how wives have been evil. The best defense(which is very lame), that feminists have is that this is male propoganda.

Studies have proven that Domestic violence is actually gender neutral, but current Indian legal system, says that only young wives, can be victims, and all males are evil.

Golden Age for adulterous wives in India

2010-06-12T09:29:00.000-07:00

Yes, it is certainly a golden age for adulterous wives in India. Under Indian laws a wife can be denied maintenance, if she has committed adultery. But adultery is very difficult to prove, particularly against a women in an Indian court. The judiciary views women as innocent and a victim. Video and photographic proofs in support of that depend solely on the judge's discretion. The judge can simply set the proofs aside, saying these are fabricated.

But now India's National Commission for Women(NCW) wants to remove that adultery clause. In fact, NCW wants to go much ahead, as reported in the below news article.
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_ncw-wants-maintenance-even-for-adulterous-wives_1298734

"(NCW) has suggested that apart from wife and children, a man should be liable to pay maintenance to stepchildren and stepparents, if any, and grandparents under section 125 of the code of criminal procedure (CrPc). In fact, NCW wants even adulterous women to be paid maintenance."

and more..............
"The commission also wants the definition of wife to be expanded to include women who have lived with a man in a relationship in the nature of marriage or are wives under irregular or voidable marriages.
NCW has also proposed removing the word "illegimate" from section 125 (i) (b) and replacing it with "child", besides enlarging the section's purview to include adopted children and adult children who are unemployed and daughters who are unmarried."

God save the country. So if the wife is an immoral women, still the husband, has to cater to her demands. This is like rubbing salt on injury.

SuperFreakonomics or SuperLies ?

2010-06-05T04:10:00.000-07:00

In the book SuperFreakonomics On page 5, the book says that "more then 100,000 young Indian women die in fires every year, many of them "bride burnings" or other instances of domestic abuse."

It was this sort of extremely false propaganda from the so called intellegentsia, that lead to the creation of extremely tyrannical laws like IPC 498A, Domestic violence act. Also the courts always treats the wife as a victim, and the husband as the perpetrator. Even if the wife is lying blatantly, no punishment is given to her.

The authors didn't even cared to check the real statistics so readily available on the internet. Indian govt publishes all crime statistics at http://ncrb.nic.in/home.htm. The data from ncrb, says the official dowry death figure for the year 2008 is 8093. However, there is a dirty practise in India, in which relatives of a women, mostly file a false dowry death case, with the sole motive to extort money from her husband. Most of these cases finally result in acquittal.

Under emotion, people loose their balance of mind. Since these laws were created under emotionally charged atmosphere, they aren't balanced, with the result being, that these laws are ill drafted, and are wide open to interpretations, and hence are widely misused by unscrupulous Indian wives to extort money from their husbands.

More such false claims about India are made in the book, which also cast a shadow of doubt on the authenticity of other so called research.

Tortured by wife, police inspector commits suicide

2010-04-19T08:43:00.000-07:00

If a senior police officer can be harassed by his wife, imagine the torture, that a common Indian citizen, has to undergo.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Troubled-by-ex-wife-cop-shoots-self/articleshow/5829717.cms

MUMBAI: The constables of Borivali police station were shocked when they heard a bullet shot coming from the changing room early on Sunday morning. Police inspector S Patil had shot himself in the head with his service revolver and was found lying on the ground inside the room.

"He was on duty the previous night and in the morning, once his shift got over, he walked into the changing room and shot himself," said additional commissioner of police, Ramrao Pawar. In his suicide note, Patil blamed his ex-wife and her brothers for pushing him to take this step.

The Borivali police have arrested Nirmala Desai (50), Baban Desai (45) and Dutta Desai (40) in this case. Initial investigations reveal that Patil was alledegly regularly troubled by his ex-wife and her brothers for money.

Married to Patil in 1978, Nirmala left him in the 1982 since Patil was just a constable at that time and she didn't want to live with him. "They didn't get an official divorce but she gave him in writing that he could marry anybody else if he wants," added Pawar. Soon, Patil married for the second time and now has three children in this marriage. Few years ago, Patil got promoted to the post of an inspector and this is when Nirmala allegedly started harassing him.

"She and her brother would regularly blackmail Patil by threatening to malign his reputation in the society to extort money out of him. Since his children weren't aware of Patil's past, he wanted to keep it a secret and adhered to their demands," said another senior official. With the harassment lasting for almost four years, Patil had already shelled out Rs 7.5 lakh to the trio to keep their mouth shut. Still, Nirmala's brother started demanding Rs 10 lakhs more from Patil. "In his suicide note, Patil has mentioned that this was the main reason for him to take this step," added the officer.

Just four days ago, Nirmala had also sent a written notice to Patil asking for an alimony. The trio has now been arrested under sections 306 (abetment of suicide) and 384 (extortion of money) of the Indian Penal Code.

Indian Wife burn husbands genitals (in Australia)

2010-04-13T10:19:00.000-07:00

In an extremely barbaric act an Indian wife, Rajini Narayan burnt her husband's genitals.

http://glimmernews.com/satish-narayan-died-after-set-ablaze-by-wife-rajini-narayan/

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/penis-burning-wife-rajini-narayan-set-for-murder-trial-in-sa-supreme-court/story-e6frea6u-1225840031701

Rajini allegedly poured methylated spirits over her husband’s genitals before setting him on fire in December 2008. Satish then knocked over the bottle of spirits, leading to a fire that caused $1 million damage. He suffered major burns in the fire and died in hospital, themedia report said.

Last year, the court heard the claim that Rajini had confessed to the attack.

“My husband loves another woman, he hugs her. I’m a jealous wife, his penis should belong to me, I just wanted to burn his penis so it belongs to me and no one else,” she is alleged to have told neighbours.

Even though this extremely barbaric act cannot be justified at all. Many Indian women actually support her. Pity for Rajni, she committed this shameful act in Australia. Had she committed this in India, the Indian feminists (aka feminazi's) would have ensured, that she goes scot-free.

Have a look at the comments made by Indian women, supporting this evil women
http://frigginloon.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/woman-set-fire-to-her-husbands-genitals/

Many of them are justifying this act, showing how barbaric and mean, Indian wives are. Though I don't want to make a generalization, the fact remains, that it is the aussies, who have made balanced comments, and not Indians.

Indian laws are very much biased towards such unscrupulous wives. Search for 498a, Hindu Marriage Act, DV act. A husband asking divorce is looked as if, he has committed a big crime. Indian legal system as a whole isn't at all democratic(civilized) in nature, and so is true about Indian society in general. Someone above has commented, that "divorce" is a civilized way. Try telling that to an Indian women, and see the reaction. From some of the comments in the post above, well anyone can gauge the level of civility that these Indian wives have.

Feminists lies - inflated numbers everywhere

2010-04-05T09:05:00.000-07:00

An example of how feminists have this nasty habit of inflating numbers of crime against women, is given in the book freakonomics.

Women’s rights advocates, for instance, have hyped the incidence
of sexual assault, claiming that one in three American women will in their lifetime be a victim of rape or attempted rape. (The actual figure is more like one in eight—but the advocates know it would take a callous person to publicly dispute their claims.)

No wonder, same is done in India too, where cheats galore. Despite official government statistics too, pointing to misuse of laws intended to protect wives, these laws are becoming more stringent and stupid. The rate of suicide of husbands in India is almost double that of married women. (57639 Males, to 30224 Females)
Still the feminists are crying hoarse about suicides by Indian wives. Interestingly, amongst single males and females, the rate of suicide is
same.

Blatant misuse of DV, to implicate driver !!

2010-03-23T09:09:00.000-07:00

A blatant violation of basic rules, while initiating any proceedings. Below is an example of how lazy and incompetent the lower courts in India are. The lower judiciary seldom applies it mind, while initiating proceedings. And then they claim, they have flood of cases!.

A person working as driver while implicated by a women under Domestic violence Act. He wasn't her relative. This person, was working as a driver in that household. Shows the extremely corrupt nature of police too. Fortunately for him, the high court ruled in his favor. Pathetic law, shameful supporters of this law.

============================================

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated:- 31.08.2009

Coram:-

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.REGUPATHI

Crl. O.P. No. 91 of 2009 and

M.P. No. 1 of 2009

K. Viswanathan ... Petitioner

vs.

Sivamalar ... Respondent

Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
for the relief as stated therein. For Petitioner : Mr.V. Gopinath,

Senior Counsel

For Respondent : Mr. P. Duraisamy

O R D E R

The 5th respondent in the C.M.P filed before the trial court, admittedly driver of the 1st and 2nd respondents is the petitioner herein and he seeks for a direction to call for the records and quash the proceedings in C.M.P. No. 8207 of 2008 filed under Sections 12, 17, 18 and 19 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 before the Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Coimbatore, who took the same on file and ordered issuance of summons. The 5th respondent in the C.M.P. No. 8207 of 2008,

3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that admittedly, the petitioner is neither a family member nor having any domestic relationship with the family of respondents 1 and 2 and under such circumstance, he is erroneously included as one of the respondents in the application. By referring to Para 13a of the application, wherein the applicant prays for a declaration to the effect that she is entitled to reside in the shared household and the prayer at Para 13b for a direction to respondents 1 to 5 to hand over gold jewellery and sridhana property in their custody, learned Senior counsel submits that a person can be included as a respondent in an application of this kind only in the event of the aggrieved person establishing the domestic relationship with such person sought to be taken as respondent as a family member living together in the joint family and contended that the petitioner is not a person coming under the purview of "respondent" and he is not in possession and control over the sridhana property; therefore it is a fit case to quash proceedings against him.

4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent submits that specific
allegations have been made in Para No. 6 of the application to the effect that the petitioner was always acting as if he was also a family member in the household and playing a dominant role by taking important decisions, but curiously respondents 1 to 4 are under the clutches of the petitioner for unknown reasons. It is also alleged that the petitioner even had the audacity to abuse the husband of the respondent herein in front of his parents.

5. Heard the submissions made on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6. The words "respondent" and "domestic relationship" have been defined in 2 (f) (q) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. 2(f): ""Domestic relationship" means a relationship between two persons who live or have, at any point of time, lived together in a shared household, when they are related by consanguinity, marriage, or through a relationship in the nature of marriage, adoption or are family members living together as a joint family" . 2(q) ""respondent" means any adult male person who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the aggrieved person and against whom the aggrieved person has sought any relief under this Act."

7. Having regard to the operation of the Act as against the person who is sought to be taken as "respondent" in the proceedings initiated thereunder, it must be pointed out that unless the aggrieved person, namely, respondent herein, substantiates that the person concerned has got domestic relationship or that he is a family member, such person cannot be mechanically impleaded as one of the respondents in the application. If the respondent has any grievance against the petitioner, she is always at liberty to initiate proceedings against him before the appropriate forum for any offence committed by him against her, if she is so advised.

8. Considering the facts and circumstance, I do not find any justification on the part of the trial court in including the petitioner as one of the respondents in the application; therefore, the proceeding pending in CMP No. 8207 of 2008 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No. I, Coimbatore is directed to be quashed in so far as the petitioner / 5th respondent is concerned.

9. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is ordered and consequently,
miscellaneous petition is closed.

To

1. Judicial Magistrate No. I,

Coimbatore
============================================

Marriage without sex is anathema - Supreme Court of India

2010-03-18T19:45:00.000-07:00

"Marriage without sex is an anathema. Sex is the foundation of marriage and without a vigorous and harmonious sexual activity it would be impossible for any marriage to continue for long. It cannot be denied that the sexual activity in marriage has an extremely favourable influence on a woman’s mind and body. The result being that if she does not get proper sexual satisfaction it will lead to depression and frustration. It has been said that the sexual relations when happy and harmonious vivifres woman’s brain, develops her character and trebles her vitality. It must be recognized that nothing is more fatal to marriage than disappointment in sexual intercourse."
   Supreme Court of India, in Vinita Saxena Vs Pankaj Pandit.
    Date of Judgement - 21/03/2006
   Quoting from The Division Bench in the case of
    Rita Nijhawan vs. Balkrishan Nijhawan in AIR 1973 Delhi 200 at 209

And you thought, marriage is based upon trust, understanding, blah, blah, blah.

Husband burnt alive by wife and her relatives

2010-03-02T11:16:00.000-08:00

http://www.loksatta.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=51536:2010-03-01-19-16-15&catid=50:2009-07-15-04-02-43&Itemid=61

March 1, 2010, Amhednagar, Maharashtra, In a gruesome incident, a husband, was brutally burnt to death, by his wife's relatives. Tofkhana police have registered a murder case against six people, including the wife. A badly burnt Ramesh Siddayya Mahesuni(age 45) died at around 8 AM. Initially the police arrested these people, for attempt to murder. Later police, filed a case of murder against, his wife Roopali, Pooja karanpure, Shankar karanpure, Ashok Magar, Sagar karanpure, and Sunny. There was some dispute between Ramesh and his wife Roopali. Roopali had earlier filed a complaint against her husband. Yesterday night, Ramesh visited his in laws for discussions. Pooja and Ashok threw petrol and kerosene on Ramesh, and set him on fire. Police have registered an offence of murder, and rioting. ASI Bhondawe is doing further investigation.

A harassed Indian Father

2010-02-08T12:06:00.000-08:00

Recently there is a nice programme on Zee Marathi, called "Yaala Jivan Aise Naav". Loosely translated as "This is what is called Life". The show is hosted by Renuka Shahane. The show is very down to earth, and it aims to put forth, problems suffered by common men. The show is characterized by it simplicity, and its direct to the problem approach, avoiding all the publicity gimmicks rampant nowadays.

In the episode on 6th February, a gentleman, by the name Purushottam Mahajan, had appeared on the show.
After hearing his plight, everyone's eye's were welled with tears, including the ever cheerful Renuka Shahane, even she couldn't control her tears. Even though the court, had granted visitation rights to this father, his wife, didn't allowed him access to his only son. It is more then 10 months, that this father, hasn't even had a glimpse of his only son, whom he so dearly loves. And the Family court hasn't even done anything, even when this is a glaring contempt of court. Such was the father-son bonding, that his little son, had himself, requested the marriage counsellor in court, to increase the visitation time, with his father. Whenever this father, used to visit his son, at his school, his son would point to his friends, and tell them, see " There comes my best friend !".

When his wife was leaving his house, the police had accompanied her. At that time, his son, requested the wife, that "Mummy, maybe, we shouldn't leave Papa's house". On hearing this, the cruel wife, started thrashing that 9 year old child, with her chappals. Such was the cruelty of the event, that even Police were moved.

Bowing to his wife's wishes, the husband, left his career in films, and took a job in a bank. He helped her start a beauty parlor. He tried to inculcate good values in her. He took her to places like British Library, etc, but she was never into it. In the mean time, she developed extra marital relationships with a police officer, which later she used to harass her husband. Not content with verbally abusing her husband, she used to physically abuse him too. Add to it, always insulting him, and his parents. In short, he had a hellish life.

Amongst all this it was SIFF, which offered him hope, and gave him the determination to fight against
this injustice. SIFF'ian Ajit Sakharkar helped him.

There are lacs of Indian husbands, who have the same plight, many are even worse then this. Atleast Mr. Purushottam got to vent his plight, but what about the lacs of others, who are suffering silently, and are on the way to commit suicide ? Does our so called great nation, has anything to offer solace to them ? Surprisingly, even though they are victim of domestic violence, Indian law, cannot help them in any way, since Indian legal system is of the view, that a husband, can never be harassed !

The videos are kept on youtube, at the below link,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zMBfTXPI88

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXkz_UNxkB4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nFo_RI0Yl8

Cursed Indian Male

2010-02-08T11:08:00.000-08:00

What does it means to be a male in Indian society. Add honesty, and integrity to it, and the result is a target, which is wide open for a free for all, harassment. If the male is married, and the wife is unscrupulous, the male better commit suicide, and that is what most Indian husbands are doing. We have a society, in which suicides of married husbands are double that of married women, and still he is brandished as the perpetrator. And to ensure that he is thoroughly given a hellish experience, right here on earth, the great Indian legal machinery is there to support the evil Indian wife. She has been equipped with very lethal and potent laws, 498a, DV, HMA, 406, DP, are few of them. This blog is a honest attempt to try to give my meagre contribution, to the battle against this evil.

Cursed Indian Male

Is Delhi the r*pe capital or wh*re capital

Why Family courts got created in India

International Men's Day Press Release, by Men's Rights Association

Ladies and Jerks

Why Maria Susairaj got "acquitted"

Does Family Implies only Females ?

Fallacy of rising crime against women

How you can stop the suicides

Why did the family committed suicide

Tolerance for legal terrorists (and their supporters) ?

Should Death by Stoning be Introduced ?

Why institution of marriage came into being ???

Shiney Ahuja and biased Indian laws

Domestic violence against men

Golden Age for adulterous wives in India

SuperFreakonomics or SuperLies ?

Tortured by wife, police inspector commits suicide

Indian Wife burn husbands genitals (in Australia)

Feminists lies - inflated numbers everywhere

Blatant misuse of DV, to implicate driver !!

Marriage without sex is anathema - Supreme Court of India

Husband burnt alive by wife and her relatives

A harassed Indian Father

Cursed Indian Male

Is Delhi the rpe capital or whre capital