Motherhood is not tied to female gender, and females are NOT goddesses

In many debates, one point often raised by feminists and orthodox/socialists/communists/PC's is, Ah, but women is a mother/Goddess, and NO mother can be evil. Further these perverts want us to believe that women are Goddesses.
This argument implies, that only a women can be a mother. In ancient Indian texts, lot of sanctity is attached to the term Mother. While going through the ancient Indian texts, it is pretty clear, that the term mother is not at all attached to the physical female gender. Relating Prakriti to physical female gender, is plain stupid and nonsense. It exposes a very shallow understanding of these ancient text.


Females are not goddesses, and females were never worshiped in ancient India. In Devi Bhagwat, the Devi (Goddess) herself says that she is not a female, and considering her as a female is stupidity. The Goddess further says that she is beyond all these physical classifications.

In Maharashtra(India), there were many great saints like Dnyaneshwar, Tukaram, who called Lord Vitthala, as their mother. This even though Lord Vitthala has a wife (Rukmini). But these saints call Vitthala as their mother and not Rukmini.
The definition of Mother as given in these texts is someone who cares for, who is the creator, and not the one whose gender is female.
Devotees of  these saints term these saints as their mother. Hence Dnyaneshwar is referred to as "Maauli" in marathi, which means a very affectionate mother. This is because Dnyaneshwar cared for people, and he created Dnyaneshwari for the masses. There are plenty of references in spiritual text,where the traditional male God is referred to as Mother.

Hence please stop glorifying female simply because they can give birth. In the future this dependence on females is going to be anyways eliminated.

Suicide Stats for 2014

NCRB has published suicide stats for the year 2014. It shows the same continuous disturbing trend of the widening gap between male and female suicides.

Below is a graph of suicide numbers for males and females since 1967. Many people try to incorrectly portray this as a husband wife problem. However the reality is much more complex, and it affects all males.

To get a better understanding of the issue, below is a graph of increasing suicide ratio of Men since 1967. The percentage gap continues to widen alarmingly after the mid-90's. The male suicides are now more then 100% that of females suicides. More males are committing suicide as compared to females.

Marriage and Sakharam Binder, The play

"Sakharam Binder" is a very famous play in marathi, and has been translated into other languages. It generated a lot of controversy, when it was first performed on stage in 1972, and was banned later around 1974. It was written by Vijay Tendulkar, who wrote on social issues and was a staunch feminist. The play was criticized, because the central character was a man, who didn't believed in the institution of marriage.

The story Sakharam Binder is about a man, who doesn't believes in marriage. He stays in a live-in relationship with women. Before entering into a relationship, he makes clear to the women, that either party can break the relationship and go on their own separate way.  He tells them upfront, that they have to do the duties of husband and wife. If they separate, he will give her money and new clothes. His life is going on in this way. His neighbour, is very envious of Sakharam. Each of his relationship lasts from a few months, to a few years. He starts living with a women (lets call her Savitri), who is shown to be very obedient and religious. The writer has tried to portray her as a timid, helpless women (abla-naari).  Savitri has a habit of talking with herself. Savitri talks very little with Sakharam. Savitri does has verbal fights with Sakharam sometimes. After some time, Sakharam says that their  personalities don't match, and that they should separate. This supposedly homely women, who used to say him, that I have lots of people to depend on, now tells him, that she would like to stay with him. After some discussion, they decide to separate.

Later Sakharam starts living with another women, lets call her Shurpanakha. Shurpanakha is shown to be very aggressive, bold, beautiful and doesn't listens to Sakharam. Sakharam, tells here, that if she is staying with him, he is providing her with money, and she has to cook and have intercourse with him. Once her ex-husband, comes to their house, and says that he wants Shurpanakha back. Her ex-husband is a police officer. But Shurpanakha doesn't wants to go back, and tells him to get out. Her ex-husband, says he is very fond of her, and even likes the beatings he gets from Shurpanakha. Still Shurpanakha throws him out. The life of this couple is going on. One day, Savitri comes back and pleads Sakharam to take her back. Sakharam doesn't wants her, but Shurpanakha tells him to allow Savitri to stay. Shurpanakha says, Savitri will be of help to her in household chores. Sakharam doesn't likes savitri but obeys Shurpanakha, and Savitri starts staying with them. 
After some time, Savitri observes that Shurpanakha has physical relationship with Sakharam's neighbour. Savitri doesn't likes that and starts poisoning Sakharam's mind about Shurpanakha. Due to this constant poisoning of Sakharam's mind, one day, in a fit of anger, he hits Shurpanakha, and Shurpanakha dies. Sakharam is very stunned, as to what has happened. His limbs become im-mobile, and he is very sorry for what he has done, and gets very scared. However at this moment, Savitri consoles him, and says don't worry. Savitri starts talking about how bad Shurpanakha was, and that Sakharam, has done a good job by killing her. Savitri tells Sakharam not to worry, and be happy that the evil women has died. Savitri tells Sakharam to dispose of Shurpanakha's body and says no one will know. Sakharam follows her advise, and buries Shurpanakha.

This play is hailed by feminists since it highlights male dominance, and how women are always the victim. When I saw this play, I was amused. Since this play in fact, shows how scheming women are. Even the kind, who are shown as timid, and abused by men. It is Savitri who poisons Sakharam's mind and provokes him to murder Shurpankha. And still Savitri is the victim ??? Both the women are evil, but are portrayed as victims.

All such thoughts of women being always the victim no matter what the real facts are, stem from the male-hating environment, which has prevailed from centuries. Real facts do not matter. All facts, are twisted to show, how women is the victim, and men are the perpetrator of evil deeds. Such mindsets has given birth to the current perverted Marriage Amendment Bill, which states that women is always the victim, and every husband has to pay for it. Such laws will be applicable to live-in relationships too. So those who do not marry aren't safe either :)

Being objective is termed as anti-women

During any gender debate, if you put unbiased thoughts about equality. That men and women should have equal rights and responsibilities too. You will be immediately termed as anti-women. Things have gone to such extreme, that even if you ask for basic rights for Men, and don't say anything about women. The first query, that is often put up is "Are you anti-women" ?  On the other hand, those who bash up males and put up extremely biased anti-male thoughts are hailed as social reformers.

If one looks at the real facts, like the constantly growing suicide of Men in India. If one tries to spread awareness about how men are over stressed in all spheres of life, and which is causing this silent genocide of men. Still the first query, that is often put up is "Are you anti-women" ?

If you objectively try to fight for Mens Rights, you will be always be labeled as anti-women by majority of the public. Why do people think that being objective is "anti-women". There are several reasons for that. We live in a society which is very gender biased, and heavily sympathetic to women. Add to it, from childhood, minds are poisoned against males. Human civilization has still to mature, to truly understand the meaning of equality. Till the time, that maturity comes, Mens Rights Activists (MRA's) will always be termed as anti women.

But are MRA's concerned about this narrow minded view of the society ?  Well of course not. Since MRA's know, that human civilization has not yet matured, and it will take years to shed thousands of years of cultivated anti-male hatred (misandry). If anyone is terming MRA's as anti-women. It is the incorrect perspective of the male hater. Hopefully with efforts of MRA's, we will live in a society, where there will be gender equality.

Does crime has a gender ?

Majority of the people, think that criminality is associated with the male gender. A direct reflection of this is the lenient attitude shown towards female criminals. There is a thinking that, if a female, has done any crime, it would be always because of some obligation, and not because of her own "free will".

There is another widespread view, that in some societies and religions, women are treated in a sub human way, and are denied basic rights, and violence is committed on them. Many of these idiots do not know, the real facts. For example the first suicide bomber used against Israel, was a female. Now how come in a society where women are said to be oppressed, confined only to their houses, would be able to do such a act. The feminists have no sound argument to counter this. All they can do is misguide the general public.
Female suicide bombers are almost everywhere. India's ex-prime minister Rajiv Gandhi, was killed by a female suicide bomber. In Tihar jail in Delhi, 46% of murder convicts are women. And even if a women kills her newborn, that is okay, which is what had happened in Thane.  The judgement is uploaded here. See how inferences are drawn, when the accused is a women.

When there is any news, in which a women is at the receiving end. Even if the perpetrators are women, people start shouting that women need to be protected, and anti-male laws are demanded. This pervert demand stems from the mentality  that only males are criminal. Such male hatred needs to be stopped.