Motherhood is not tied to female gender, and females are NOT goddesses

In many debates, one point often raised by feminists and orthodox/socialists/communists/PC's is, Ah, but women is a mother/Goddess, and NO mother can be evil. Further these perverts want us to believe that women are Goddesses.
This argument implies, that only a women can be a mother. In ancient Indian texts, lot of sanctity is attached to the term Mother. While going through the ancient Indian texts, it is pretty clear, that the term mother is not at all attached to the physical female gender. Relating Prakriti to physical female gender, is plain stupid and nonsense. It exposes a very shallow understanding of these ancient text.


Females are not goddesses, and females were never worshiped in ancient India. In Devi Bhagwat, the Devi (Goddess) herself says that she is not a female, and considering her as a female is stupidity. The Goddess further says that she is beyond all these physical classifications.

In Maharashtra(India), there were many great saints like Dnyaneshwar, Tukaram, who called Lord Vitthala, as their mother. This even though Lord Vitthala has a wife (Rukmini). But these saints call Vitthala as their mother and not Rukmini.
The definition of Mother as given in these texts is someone who cares for, who is the creator, and not the one whose gender is female.
Devotees of  these saints term these saints as their mother. Hence Dnyaneshwar is referred to as "Maauli" in marathi, which means a very affectionate mother. This is because Dnyaneshwar cared for people, and he created Dnyaneshwari for the masses. There are plenty of references in spiritual text,where the traditional male God is referred to as Mother.

Hence please stop glorifying female simply because they can give birth. In the future this dependence on females is going to be anyways eliminated.

Being objective is termed as anti-women

During any gender debate, if you put unbiased thoughts about equality. That men and women should have equal rights and responsibilities too. You will be immediately termed as anti-women. Things have gone to such extreme, that even if you ask for basic rights for Men, and don't say anything about women. The first query, that is often put up is "Are you anti-women" ?  On the other hand, those who bash up males and put up extremely biased anti-male thoughts are hailed as social reformers.

If one looks at the real facts, like the constantly growing suicide of Men in India. If one tries to spread awareness about how men are over stressed in all spheres of life, and which is causing this silent genocide of men. Still the first query, that is often put up is "Are you anti-women" ?

If you objectively try to fight for Mens Rights, you will be always be labeled as anti-women by majority of the public. Why do people think that being objective is "anti-women". There are several reasons for that. We live in a society which is very gender biased, and heavily sympathetic to women. Add to it, from childhood, minds are poisoned against males. Human civilization has still to mature, to truly understand the meaning of equality. Till the time, that maturity comes, Mens Rights Activists (MRA's) will always be termed as anti women.

But are MRA's concerned about this narrow minded view of the society ?  Well of course not. Since MRA's know, that human civilization has not yet matured, and it will take years to shed thousands of years of cultivated anti-male hatred (misandry). If anyone is terming MRA's as anti-women. It is the incorrect perspective of the male hater. Hopefully with efforts of MRA's, we will live in a society, where there will be gender equality.

The false propaganda of Crime Against Women

If a women hurts/cheats another women, shall it be labelled as crime against women ?  Yes it is. However, for all crime against women, Men are held responsible, and laws are enacted to that effect, to harass Men. Going by the same logic, when a man is hurt/harassed, it should be labelled as crime against men. And should laws be framed to hold women responsible for that ? And going by numbers, crime against men is a much much bigger issue, then crime against women. Please refer http://ncrb.nic.in/ for statistics.

The general perception is that crime against women, necessarily means that a man, must have harassed an abla naari. Going by reality on ground, this is very incorrect. Unfortunately by reality, people today believe, what is shown in media. Media doesn't show reality, they show, news items, that are spicy(aka yellow journalism).  A news like "girl molested/raped" gets more viewership, then one, which says, "farmer used innovative techniques to improve crop production". So media tries hard to find news about women being harassed. And if they don't find one, they stage it.As is evident from the recent news about molestation in Assam. http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Guwahati/Scribe-behind-Assam-molestation/Article1-889772.aspx   Crime against Men, well people don't even think about it, since it is not so spicy. Not a spicy topic to do time pass discussion.

Crime against women, very clearly implies, that don't treat women as equal to men. Such narrow minded classifications, are orthodox, and regressive. Normally the self proclaimed women reformers are in the forefront, of always, classifying anything related to women in a very perverted manner. This is very dangerous for society, and is very destructive.A glaring example of this destruction, is the huge number of male suicides in India. Due to the biased Indian laws, tens of thousands of crores are wasted due to lost productivity of Men who get caught in false cases of crime against women.

Satyamev Jayate and the art of False Propaganda

This blog post is dedicated to the arm-chair, self-proclaimed conscious social activist. Please read this ENTIRE post before commenting.....

 

*.) On 6th May, I saw the episode of "Satyamev Jayate"(SJ) on TV. Female foeticide was the topic. I nearly cried seeing the episode. Girls  are being killed in their mothers womb. Amir Khan did a fantastic job. I was horrified to learn about this ancient practise still being carried out in modern day India. Helpless abla naari's are forced to abort their child. What an evil society (sob sob). The episode was a real eye opener.

 They showed how male:female ratio is getting lop sided. Grooms aren't finding brides because of all this female foeticide. Thus adding to the problem in a "sex-starved" country. Suddenly it struck me, if I go outside my house, I see mostly males everywhere. Where  have all the ladies gone ? In buses, on roads, in offices, everywhere males are more in number then women. My God, how ignorant of me, how come I didn't realized this. That's why, No "nayan sukh" tch tch.

 I browsed through their website, and pledged my support to the cause. I posted my comment. I felt better.  I have done my small bit for the cause. Well done Amir. I will try spreading the word. STOP killing the GIRL child.

 

*.) Indira Gandhi 
 So well entrenched is the male dominance in this country, that women face an uphill task proving themselves in this country. Take the e.g. of Mrs. Sonia Gandhi. Only because of this lady's charisma, the Congress party could win elections. But still she couldn't become the PM, when she had every right to it. Issues about her foreign origin were raised. Clearly overlooking the fact, that her stay in India is more then in Italy. Even now, this same male dominated society is okay to accept her son Rahul, but her highly talented daughter Priyanka has been kept away from politics. Indira Gandhi, was similarly taunted as "Goongi Goodiya" meaning dumb doll. Keep in mind, that this same, dumb doll, handed Pakistan a crushing defeat. No male Indian PM has been ever able to equal her feat. Shame to the gender-biased Indian people, sorry men.

*.) Every now and then there are rape stories in the media. One survey had concluded that India was the 4th most dangerous place for women, in the whole world. Shame on Indian men. They are no.1 lechers and not content with being lecher, if they see, any gullible women, their first thought is to rape them.

*.) Bride burning

 From the book, Super Freakonomics  - "More then 100,000 young Indian women die in fires every year, many of them "bride burnings" or other instances of domestic abuse.
 This is just the tip of the iceberg. Amir Khan must create one more episode on this.

*.) Aryan Invasion Theory 

   The local people in India were an uncivilized lot. Hence the Aryans had to come down to educate these people (or rather beasts). The Aryans transformed the culture of this country from being uncivilized adivasis to one of the most advanced culture in the world at that time. However with time, all that the Aryans taught was forgotten, and thousands of years later, it took the British to reform this country. Had the British not arrived in India, India would have never caught up with the world in the area of science, and all aspects of modern civilization.

Conclusion ::  India is really an evil country. India is the worlds biggest arms importer, and preaches peace to the world, what a hypocrisy. The USA should probably nuke this country alongwith Af-Pak.  That would solve most of the world's problem. This area is a hot bed of problem for the world.

Please note, that all of the above are equally true (or equally false). If your believe in one, you believe in ALL of these. Some people would agree with some, and disagree with some. If you agree with any of these, please continue reading below.

 The intelligent person would easily know, the true facts, and that all of the above examples are plain bull crap.

*.) Female foeticide

   There are stringent laws in place to tackle this so-called fantasy.

   IPC - 313. A mere verbal complaint by any women, that she was forced to abort her child, can land whoever she accuses in jail. Whether her accusations are true or false, is a subject matter of trial. The very trials, which are slow and torturous. The punishment for this offence is 10 years to life imprisonment.  
 Propaganda is that female infanticide is going on for centuries. Then by this time, female species should have had vanished in India (or atleast some parts of it)  ?
 If the gender ratio is so lop sided, then common sense would tell that demand for brides would be higher and dowry would be given to girl's family, isn't it ? Still AK shows how prevalent dowry practise is in India, and how girls family is harassed.
 Covered more in depth by Virag http://legalfighter.wordpress.com/2012/05/08/aamir-khan-promotes-female-feticide/

*.) Bride Burning

  Have a look at http://www.facebook.com/BrideBurningHoax?sk=info

*.) Rape Stories
 Please wait, the Indian govt is working on introducing new laws to curb this menace. It might help you to know, that majority of the rape cases are found to be of consensual intercourse. Just deal gone bad. Do RTI and collect your own data. Even google will show you some data. Check judgements on rape cases - both acquittals and convictions.

*.)  Indira Gandhi - She was very eager to attack Pakistan, at that very moment. But the then army chief convinced her to wait, and prepare well. He won the war, and accolades went to Indira. She was called Devi(Goddess), etc. What the army won during war, was lost by Indira at the discussion table with Pakistan. During her rule, sycophancy had reached its peak. If you read current news, you yourself decide about Sonia Gandhi and Congress.

*.)  Aryan Invasion Theory
       http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_new-research-debunks-aryan-invasion-theory_1623744
       http://www.hindunet.org/hindu_history/ancient/aryan/aryan_frawley.html

Hope in the future, you will use your brains first, before jumping to conclusion on false propaganda like "Female Foeticide".

The problem most people in India have is that the show is conducted by Amir Khan(AK). AK is a good actor. But being a good actor, doesn't means, he is conscious about the social reality. Majority of the Indians take the criticism directed towards AK as very personal. When emotions run high, objectivity is normally the first casualty. If people don't have the stomach to face opposing views, such people shouldn't speak/debate about social issues. Most of these AK fans are arm chair activists.
The AK fans say, he is spreading awareness. Fact is, AK is earning money, out of pain inflicted on society. This is actually a severe form of moral corruption. More to say, but tired of the tirade now :)

Please stop spreading misandry (male hatred)

It is taboo to speak about male foeticide in India

The Indian media is always full of stories about female foeticide. If one speaks about female foeticide, media glamorizes the speaker. The speaker is seen as progressive. While the real fact remains, that such people, who talk about female foeticide, are fraudsters. They are intellectually hollow, and morally corrupt. They don't have any data to back their rubbish claims, but they use this topic to gain cheap publicity.

While on the other hand, talking about male foeticide is a big taboo. Anyone raising the issue is made fun of, and considered an idiot. Any news items related to male foeticide are suppressed by the media. Brothel is one such place, where male foetus, are selectively aborted, and no one gives a damn about it.Many so called "social activists" go to brothel to rescue women, but haven't heard anyone going there to stop this male foeticide.

When the news about foetuses found in a garbage dump surfaced. As usual brain dead people started barking about female foeticide. Only when the news came out that majority of these foetuses were male, did these  misandrist stopped barking. "Out of the 13 foetuses found, three were female, six were male and the sex of the rest of them could not be determined." Which means, it is okay to kill males.

The below article cites instances.
http://www.termpaperslab.com/essay-on-male-foeticide-is-the-order-of/49456.html