Why are anti male laws created in India ?

The Indian government and  publicity hungry feminists(Krishan Tirath, Renuka Chaudhary, et al) are hell bent on destroying the Indian family system.
Aesops fables teach us a lot, below is a very beautiful story, as to why the feminists are hell bent on destroying the Indian family system.

The Fox without a Tail 

One day a fox was out walking when suddenly he heard a loud snapping noise and felt a sharp pain in his rear.
“Ooooow!!!!” howled the fox, tears coming to his eyes. “That hurts. Ooooow!!!
The fox looked behind him and saw his tail was caught in a trap. He struggled and struggled to get free but his tail was firmly stuck in the jaws of the trap.
With one last frantic effort the fox used all his strength and broke free.
“Ooooow!!!!” howled the fox as he looked behind him and saw his tail still stuck in the trap. All he had left was a little stump on his backside.
“My tail, my beautiful fluffy tail. What will I do?” he cried. “How will I face all the other foxes without my beautiful tail? It will be so embarrassing.”
The fox thought and thought and finally came up with a plan.
He called all the other foxes together for a meeting.
When the other foxes saw the little stump on his backside they began to laugh.
“I've cut off my tail on purpose and I want you all to do the same” he yelled over the laughter.
“A large tail is more trouble than it's worth”, he shouted. “When we're being chased by dogs it gets in the way, and when we get together for a talk you never know what to do with it. Do you wrap it around your feet, do you sit on it, or do you leave it out for some one to trip over?” asked the fox.
“So now is the time to free yourself from your tail and join me in a tailless society.”
One of the older foxes shook his head and said, “You wouldn’t be saying that if you still had a beautiful tail. You’re only saying that out of your own self interest and because you’re embarrassed.”
All the other foxes walked off laughing with their big bushy tails proudly pointing upwards.

The End

What is the moral of this story?
Do not trust some one with self-interest
Misery loves company
Losing a tail is embarrassing.

The attitude of so called liberated feminists is same as the fox with broken tail. An analysis shows that the family life of these women is all screwed up. They don't have a good family life. Hence they always paint men as evil, who should suffer. And they want the same to happen in other households. Because of their own selfish attitude and misandry (male hatred), they are hell bent on making insane laws like "paying salary to house wives". Not content with making Indian men insecure at home, the "sexual harassment at workplace Bill" is going to make life more difficult for Indian men at workplace.

Be a proud fox, and destroy the feminist rants about how women are routinely oppressed, when it is a known fact, that in India, women are more powerful then men. (e.g. Sonia Gandhi, Sushma Swaraj, etc)

It is time, that the general public recognize the true intent of these evil legislations, which are supposed to protect women, but in reality do nothing, but harass innocent men, and increase their suicide count.

Please join the Save Indian Family movement, and raise your voice today, since tomorrow may be too late !!!

 

Indian Husband has to pay salary to wife !!!

Yeah, you read it right, quantify and pay salary to housewives.

http://post.jagran.com/be-ready-to-pay-salary-to-your-wife-1346764680
There is good news for housewives as they are likely to get monthly income from their husbands. The Union Ministry of Women and Child Development is mulling to prepare a draft in this regard.Very soon, the housewives will be paid for their hard work in line with the working women. The ministry is drafting a proposal to empower women. The proposal will be introduced soon before the Union Cabinet. Once the proposed bill becomes the law, it will become mandatory for the husband to pay a definite amount of his salary to his wife each month.

Consider what will happen, if this becomes a law. By quantifying such a thing, the government is shaming wives the most. If you start paying money to the services rendered by everyone in your family, it will negatively impact the emotional bonding between family members.  Tomorrow, they will force husbands to pay their wives, for any (physical) pleasure(even if they don't get)  that they can derive from her.

If your wife is earning handsomely, don't think, that you are safe from such crooked laws. The lawmakers ensure, that each wife, whether she is earning or not, gets her (un)fair share from her husband. And if the wife is going to get the money for free, a good percentage of them, would try to get it.

The Indian govt is hell bent on turning the institute of marriage into institutionalized prostitution. The above news is a step in that direction. And this is not the only step that the govt has taken. Already India has a  whole basket of matrimonial laws, which provides unscrupulous wives various ways to extort money from husbands. HMA 24 and 25, Domestic violence act, CrPC 125, proceedings under restitution of marriage - HMA 9, the soon to be enacted Marriage Ammendment Bill, and so on.


With such incentives, it is not surprising that many wives would rather just sit idle, and get free doles from their husbands, with the kind blessings of the Indian judicial system.  And all this under the guise of women empowerment !!!

By breaking the family system, the government will have more control over people. Since with the family  system gone,  government can more easily exploit people.

The false propaganda of Crime Against Women

If a women hurts/cheats another women, shall it be labelled as crime against women ?  Yes it is. However, for all crime against women, Men are held responsible, and laws are enacted to that effect, to harass Men. Going by the same logic, when a man is hurt/harassed, it should be labelled as crime against men. And should laws be framed to hold women responsible for that ? And going by numbers, crime against men is a much much bigger issue, then crime against women. Please refer http://ncrb.nic.in/ for statistics.

The general perception is that crime against women, necessarily means that a man, must have harassed an abla naari. Going by reality on ground, this is very incorrect. Unfortunately by reality, people today believe, what is shown in media. Media doesn't show reality, they show, news items, that are spicy(aka yellow journalism).  A news like "girl molested/raped" gets more viewership, then one, which says, "farmer used innovative techniques to improve crop production". So media tries hard to find news about women being harassed. And if they don't find one, they stage it.As is evident from the recent news about molestation in Assam. http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Guwahati/Scribe-behind-Assam-molestation/Article1-889772.aspx   Crime against Men, well people don't even think about it, since it is not so spicy. Not a spicy topic to do time pass discussion.

Crime against women, very clearly implies, that don't treat women as equal to men. Such narrow minded classifications, are orthodox, and regressive. Normally the self proclaimed women reformers are in the forefront, of always, classifying anything related to women in a very perverted manner. This is very dangerous for society, and is very destructive.A glaring example of this destruction, is the huge number of male suicides in India. Due to the biased Indian laws, tens of thousands of crores are wasted due to lost productivity of Men who get caught in false cases of crime against women.

Satyamev Jayate and the art of False Propaganda

This blog post is dedicated to the arm-chair, self-proclaimed conscious social activist. Please read this ENTIRE post before commenting.....

 

*.) On 6th May, I saw the episode of "Satyamev Jayate"(SJ) on TV. Female foeticide was the topic. I nearly cried seeing the episode. Girls  are being killed in their mothers womb. Amir Khan did a fantastic job. I was horrified to learn about this ancient practise still being carried out in modern day India. Helpless abla naari's are forced to abort their child. What an evil society (sob sob). The episode was a real eye opener.

 They showed how male:female ratio is getting lop sided. Grooms aren't finding brides because of all this female foeticide. Thus adding to the problem in a "sex-starved" country. Suddenly it struck me, if I go outside my house, I see mostly males everywhere. Where  have all the ladies gone ? In buses, on roads, in offices, everywhere males are more in number then women. My God, how ignorant of me, how come I didn't realized this. That's why, No "nayan sukh" tch tch.

 I browsed through their website, and pledged my support to the cause. I posted my comment. I felt better.  I have done my small bit for the cause. Well done Amir. I will try spreading the word. STOP killing the GIRL child.

 

*.) Indira Gandhi 
 So well entrenched is the male dominance in this country, that women face an uphill task proving themselves in this country. Take the e.g. of Mrs. Sonia Gandhi. Only because of this lady's charisma, the Congress party could win elections. But still she couldn't become the PM, when she had every right to it. Issues about her foreign origin were raised. Clearly overlooking the fact, that her stay in India is more then in Italy. Even now, this same male dominated society is okay to accept her son Rahul, but her highly talented daughter Priyanka has been kept away from politics. Indira Gandhi, was similarly taunted as "Goongi Goodiya" meaning dumb doll. Keep in mind, that this same, dumb doll, handed Pakistan a crushing defeat. No male Indian PM has been ever able to equal her feat. Shame to the gender-biased Indian people, sorry men.

*.) Every now and then there are rape stories in the media. One survey had concluded that India was the 4th most dangerous place for women, in the whole world. Shame on Indian men. They are no.1 lechers and not content with being lecher, if they see, any gullible women, their first thought is to rape them.

*.) Bride burning

 From the book, Super Freakonomics  - "More then 100,000 young Indian women die in fires every year, many of them "bride burnings" or other instances of domestic abuse.
 This is just the tip of the iceberg. Amir Khan must create one more episode on this.

*.) Aryan Invasion Theory 

   The local people in India were an uncivilized lot. Hence the Aryans had to come down to educate these people (or rather beasts). The Aryans transformed the culture of this country from being uncivilized adivasis to one of the most advanced culture in the world at that time. However with time, all that the Aryans taught was forgotten, and thousands of years later, it took the British to reform this country. Had the British not arrived in India, India would have never caught up with the world in the area of science, and all aspects of modern civilization.

Conclusion ::  India is really an evil country. India is the worlds biggest arms importer, and preaches peace to the world, what a hypocrisy. The USA should probably nuke this country alongwith Af-Pak.  That would solve most of the world's problem. This area is a hot bed of problem for the world.

Please note, that all of the above are equally true (or equally false). If your believe in one, you believe in ALL of these. Some people would agree with some, and disagree with some. If you agree with any of these, please continue reading below.

 The intelligent person would easily know, the true facts, and that all of the above examples are plain bull crap.

*.) Female foeticide

   There are stringent laws in place to tackle this so-called fantasy.

   IPC - 313. A mere verbal complaint by any women, that she was forced to abort her child, can land whoever she accuses in jail. Whether her accusations are true or false, is a subject matter of trial. The very trials, which are slow and torturous. The punishment for this offence is 10 years to life imprisonment.  
 Propaganda is that female infanticide is going on for centuries. Then by this time, female species should have had vanished in India (or atleast some parts of it)  ?
 If the gender ratio is so lop sided, then common sense would tell that demand for brides would be higher and dowry would be given to girl's family, isn't it ? Still AK shows how prevalent dowry practise is in India, and how girls family is harassed.
 Covered more in depth by Virag http://legalfighter.wordpress.com/2012/05/08/aamir-khan-promotes-female-feticide/

*.) Bride Burning

  Have a look at http://www.facebook.com/BrideBurningHoax?sk=info

*.) Rape Stories
 Please wait, the Indian govt is working on introducing new laws to curb this menace. It might help you to know, that majority of the rape cases are found to be of consensual intercourse. Just deal gone bad. Do RTI and collect your own data. Even google will show you some data. Check judgements on rape cases - both acquittals and convictions.

*.)  Indira Gandhi - She was very eager to attack Pakistan, at that very moment. But the then army chief convinced her to wait, and prepare well. He won the war, and accolades went to Indira. She was called Devi(Goddess), etc. What the army won during war, was lost by Indira at the discussion table with Pakistan. During her rule, sycophancy had reached its peak. If you read current news, you yourself decide about Sonia Gandhi and Congress.

*.)  Aryan Invasion Theory
       http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_new-research-debunks-aryan-invasion-theory_1623744
       http://www.hindunet.org/hindu_history/ancient/aryan/aryan_frawley.html

Hope in the future, you will use your brains first, before jumping to conclusion on false propaganda like "Female Foeticide".

The problem most people in India have is that the show is conducted by Amir Khan(AK). AK is a good actor. But being a good actor, doesn't means, he is conscious about the social reality. Majority of the Indians take the criticism directed towards AK as very personal. When emotions run high, objectivity is normally the first casualty. If people don't have the stomach to face opposing views, such people shouldn't speak/debate about social issues. Most of these AK fans are arm chair activists.
The AK fans say, he is spreading awareness. Fact is, AK is earning money, out of pain inflicted on society. This is actually a severe form of moral corruption. More to say, but tired of the tirade now :)

Please stop spreading misandry (male hatred)

It is taboo to speak about male foeticide in India

The Indian media is always full of stories about female foeticide. If one speaks about female foeticide, media glamorizes the speaker. The speaker is seen as progressive. While the real fact remains, that such people, who talk about female foeticide, are fraudsters. They are intellectually hollow, and morally corrupt. They don't have any data to back their rubbish claims, but they use this topic to gain cheap publicity.

While on the other hand, talking about male foeticide is a big taboo. Anyone raising the issue is made fun of, and considered an idiot. Any news items related to male foeticide are suppressed by the media. Brothel is one such place, where male foetus, are selectively aborted, and no one gives a damn about it.Many so called "social activists" go to brothel to rescue women, but haven't heard anyone going there to stop this male foeticide.

When the news about foetuses found in a garbage dump surfaced. As usual brain dead people started barking about female foeticide. Only when the news came out that majority of these foetuses were male, did these  misandrist stopped barking. "Out of the 13 foetuses found, three were female, six were male and the sex of the rest of them could not be determined." Which means, it is okay to kill males.

The below article cites instances.
http://www.termpaperslab.com/essay-on-male-foeticide-is-the-order-of/49456.html

Is Delhi the r*pe capital or wh*re capital

The Indian media has painted Delhi as the rape capital of India. This slander has mainly been spread by cheap journalists. Majority of these journo's  are losers, incompetent, don't want to do hard work, and are always looking for easy and spicy news items. To the uninformed,  most of these rape cases are false. (If you are interested, dig around for facts.)

 Yesterday, this news caught my attention
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/panchkula-double-murder/1/168609.html
 It was about a murder of a women and her daughter.The duo was found murdered in their home. The daughter was earlier involved in an MMS campaign. She had circulated MMS of another girl. (Note - Majority of so called crime against females are perpetrated by females only). Now comes the interesting part. The news report at the end said "The police also recovered around 150 condom packets from the house and were probing its connection with the murders."

Read more at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/panchkula-double-murder/1/168609.html

 Certainly these women weren't running AIDS awareness campaign, to stockpile so many condoms.
Would it be a possibility that it is a case of a deal went bad, and the women in question threatened to cry "rape". Given that majority of the rape cases are false, this is a strong possibility. And the person(maybe a gentlemen) in question,  might have thought it better to shut these women, rather then face the ignominy of being labeled as a "rapist" !!!
Given India's draconian rape laws, this is very much a possibility. And more and more men, might take this extreme step, rather then get screwed by the tyrannical laws.

Despite all of this, unfortunately instead of being called the "whore" capital, Delhi is being called as the "rape" capital.

Ladies and Jerks

It is a common practice by males to refer to "any kind of" women as a lady. Though the synonym of lady is gentleman, men are rarely referred to as gentleman. Men are mostly referred to as guy, man, etc. The general attitude of such males is that by default most males are jerks. But they forget that they themselves are the jerks.

Most men, think, that they are showing gentlemanly behavior, when they are referring to any woman as a lady. But since they themselves don't show much respect to males overall, this behavior of referring to any women as lady, makes them look like a jerk. This rubbish practice is widely prevalent in Indian society.  These men, are the fallacy of propaganda, which tells people, to respect a women, solely on the basis of her gender. This chivalrous behavior cuts through all  strata of society. By showing chivalry towards women, while showing disrespect  towards other males, makes them look sex starved.

But there are still some gentleman left, who  refer to their male counterparts as gentleman. May their tribe increase.

The need of the hour is to in-culminate gender neutral behavior, and not be blinded  by gender of any person, specifically females :-)

Why Maria Susairaj got "acquitted"

Because, she is woman !
Many would find this offensive but that is the truth. Please read her confessional statement.  Inspite of retracting her own statements, the judge didn't took ANY action against her, for this treachery. Why ? because she is a woman.  The Indian law prescribes punishment of upto seven years, for false evidence. She did all she could, to mislead people, but still she went scot free. Indian law(judiciary), is  prescribed  to the view that women, never lie, and if they do, they do because of pressure from someone else.  How can an abla naari commit such a heinous crime. The two males were to be blamed. Why did Niraj went at night to Maria's place ? So that he can threaten the abla naari, who was alone ? Many such questions, would come, if the case goes to high court.

Still, for people who are clamoring for heavy punishment for her, my best wishes.

Maria has said, that she was raped, by her boyfriend. Now what do you call that ?

Does Family Implies only Females ?

Different people have different viewpoints about anything, but in social norms, normally not many viewpoints are available. Case in point is the definition of a family. Though some may argue, that there are different views about family, when it comes to practice, there is still a majority view, which is acceptable to most people. The majority view is normally conservative. What is that view ? That view is that females are an essential part of a family, and that they need to be protected. Take an e.g. of family room/areas in a restaurant. If a group of females(with no accompanying male), enters the family area, they are greeted. It can be that none of the females are related by any blood relationship, or they may be just acquaintances of each other. But they can go in the family area. However, if say two men, who are brothers, try to enter the family room, they are normally stopped, and requested to occupy the general area. If they have a female(who may not be a "family" member) accompanying them though, they can enter the family area.

Even when people inquire a man about his family, they essentially are asking about his wife. (Indian) Society feels that females, more specifically wife is an essential part of any family. And without a wife, there can be no family. So even though, you have a loving an caring mother, sister, father, brother. That amounts to nothing, for general people. It is a faulty and shallow viewpoint though. Since these people think, that if you are not pro-creating, you aren't part of the society. It is essential to note that Indian scriptures do not mandate such a thing. Though scriptures speaks about Grushasthshram, it is not mandatory. God Hanuman never married, even when many efforts were made towards that end  by his "well-wishers". Though, if we think about it, Hanuman is an essential part of Ram's family. At their core, even other religions would subscribe to this view.

Should Death by Stoning be Introduced ?

It seems many people are eager to introduce the heinous punishment of, death by stoning. Most likely many of your friends, might have the same views too.

 Recently some person, had posted a picture, which depicted a man, dragging a girl by the hair, the caption was "0MG! This GUY must be St0ned to Death for doing this to a GIRL!"
Surprisingly this pic, was circulated quickly, and gathered a  fan following in 10's of thousands, very quickly. The people who supported this, can be easily termed as cold-blooded. Simply by seeing a picture, of which they do not have any context, no verification, whether it is a fake or not, they readily believed it. And they even supported stoning the guy to death. Wow. Many (sick) guys would have supported it, to show to their female friends, how much they care about girls. Is there any difference between taliban, and the supporters of such pic ?

In many developed countries, capital punishment is banned, however serious the crime be. But here people have pronounced a very cruel way of capital punishment, for pulling hair.

If you are really in a bad mood, and want to kick anyone's ass, I would say, people who liked this crap pic, should be on top of your list.